Camm Finishes Up On Witness Stand
Suspect Grilled About Daughter's Blood
LOUISVILLE -- The questioning of David Camm Monday focused around the T-shirt he was wearing the night his family was killed.
Camm, a former Indiana State Police trooper, is charged with killing his wife, Kimberly, and his two children, Bradley and Jill, in their Georgetown, Ind., house in September 2000.
Camm took the witness stand for the third day.NewsChannel 32's Abby Miller reported that lead Prosecutor Stan Faith grilled Camm about statements he made to investigators following the murders.Faith read from the transcript of the interview verbatim."The only thing I touched was Bradley, I did not touch Jill," Faith read from the transcript. "That's your statement, 'the only thing I touched was Bradley,' that's what you said."
Miller reported that Camm then asked to read the transcript."Mr. Camm I call attention to page 20 in the transcript in your statement. What does it say?" Faith asked."It says the only thing I touched was Brad," Camm said. "I did the best I could under the situation I was put into."Prosecutors believe that the T-shirt evidence is crucial to their case, Miller reported. Their experts testified that the blood on the shirt was high-velocity impact splatter, and only could have been created by a gunshot blast.A defense expert testified that the blood stains were created from simple contact with the source.Miller reported that prosecutors are trying to use Camm's own words to prove that he never touched his daughter, and that the only way Jill's blood could have gotten on the T-shirt would have been through a gunshot blast.Prosecutors are pressing Camm to find out how his daughter's blood got on the shirt.Miller reported that Camm gave conflicting statements to police. In one statement he said that he checked to see if Jill was alive, but in another, he said he could not bear to lift her head to check.
McDaniel admitted that Camm's statements were inconsistent, but given the stress that his client was under at the time, he considered the inconsistencies normal."I think David has described as best he can what he did getting into the vehicle to get Bradley out," McDaniel said. "As far as what he did on checking Jill -- that was in his statement, he really doesn't have a good recollection of that."Faith said that the evidence is stacking up against Camm."There is no one big bomb, but it's a series of cluster bombs," Faith said. "He's not been consistent in anything. He can't tell the story consistently with one line."Faith pressed Camm with questions about his actions with his daughter.
DAVID CAMM TRIAL ![]() VIDEO |
Miller reported that Camm then asked to read the transcript."Mr. Camm I call attention to page 20 in the transcript in your statement. What does it say?" Faith asked."It says the only thing I touched was Brad," Camm said. "I did the best I could under the situation I was put into."Prosecutors believe that the T-shirt evidence is crucial to their case, Miller reported. Their experts testified that the blood on the shirt was high-velocity impact splatter, and only could have been created by a gunshot blast.A defense expert testified that the blood stains were created from simple contact with the source.Miller reported that prosecutors are trying to use Camm's own words to prove that he never touched his daughter, and that the only way Jill's blood could have gotten on the T-shirt would have been through a gunshot blast.Prosecutors are pressing Camm to find out how his daughter's blood got on the shirt.Miller reported that Camm gave conflicting statements to police. In one statement he said that he checked to see if Jill was alive, but in another, he said he could not bear to lift her head to check.- Faith: "Why wouldn't you pull her out if there was a glimmer of hope that she was alive?"Camm: "I thought she was gone, as it states in my Sept. 28 statement."Faith: "You have to go back to that statement to answer my question?"
McDaniel admitted that Camm's statements were inconsistent, but given the stress that his client was under at the time, he considered the inconsistencies normal."I think David has described as best he can what he did getting into the vehicle to get Bradley out," McDaniel said. "As far as what he did on checking Jill -- that was in his statement, he really doesn't have a good recollection of that."Faith said that the evidence is stacking up against Camm."There is no one big bomb, but it's a series of cluster bombs," Faith said. "He's not been consistent in anything. He can't tell the story consistently with one line."Faith pressed Camm with questions about his actions with his daughter.- Faith: You did not bother to take her out of the truck to perform CPR? How can that be?Camm: I did the best that I could.Faith: You did your best at 7:30.
- Faith: You're a good shot aren't you?Camm: I was average. It doesn't make me a murderer.Faith: No it doesn't, but having high-velocity impact spatter on your shirt does, doesn't it?Camm: I don't have it. It's speculative. I do not have high-velocity impact spatter on my shirt.
Previous Stories:
- March 9, 2002: Camm Grilled On Extramarital Affairs
- March 7, 2002: Camm Takes Stand In Murder Trial
- March 5, 2002: Prosecutors Grill Camm Defense Expert
- March 4, 2002: Expert: Camm Blood Stains Not From Gun
- March 1, 2002: Camm's T-Shirt Evidence Debated At Trial
- March 1, 2002: Prosecutors Present New Camm Motive
- February 28, 2002: Uncle: Camm Was In Church Gym
- February 27, 2002: Camm's Movements Detailed On Night Of Murder
- February 26, 2002: Camm Call Threatens Prosecution's Theory
- February 25, 2002: Possible Molestation Discussed At Camm Trial
- February 22, 2002: Camm Crime Scene Prints Scrutinized
- February 21, 2002: Camm's In-Laws React To Trial
- February 21, 2002: Camm Defense Expert Testifies
- February 20, 2002: Camm's Lawyer Questions 'Psychic' Connection
- February 18, 2002: Inside View: David Camm Trial
- February 15, 2002: Camm Prosecution's Last Witness Takes Stand
- February 15, 2002: Camm Prosecution Could Rest Today
- February 14, 2002: Prosecution Nearing End Of Camm Case
- February 13, 2002: Camm's T-Shirt Scrutinized At Trial
- February 11, 2002: Jurors Get Science Lesson
- February 8, 2002: Jurors View Camm Bronco
- February 7, 2002: Doctor: Camm Children Didn't Die Instantly
- February 6, 2002: Kimberly Camm's Last Moments Detailed
- February 5, 2002: Call From Camm House Scrutinized
- February 2, 2002: Camm Trial Turns To Finances
- February 1, 2002: Camm Jury To See Bronco Friday
- January 31, 2002: More Women Testify Against Camm
- January 30, 2002: Camm's Ex-Lovers Testify At Trial
- January 29, 2002: Jury Journeys To Camm House
- January 26, 2002: Camm's Mother-In-Law Testifies At Trial
- January 25, 2002: Camm Jurors Take Field Trip
- January 24, 2002: Camm's Basketball Buddies Questioned
- January 24, 2002: Camm Investigator Takes The Stand
- January 18, 2002: Jurors Hear More Of Camm Interview
- January 17, 2002: Camm Juror's Reaction Causes Controversy
- January 16, 2002: Bombshells Dropped In Camm Case
- January 15, 2002: Lead Camm Investigator Takes Stand
- January 14, 2002: Opening Arguments Begin In Camm Trial
- January 14, 2002: Who's On The Camm Jury?
- January 9, 2002: Camm Says He's 'Ready To Go'
- January 9, 2002: Camm Jury Pool Pared Down
- January 8, 2002: Lawyers Grill Camm Jury Pool
- January 8, 2002: Jury Selection Continues In Camm Case
- January 8, 2002: Jury Selection Continues In Camm Trial
- January 7, 2002: Jury Selection Under Way In Camm Trial
- December 22, 2001: Camm Interview Portions Released
- December 20, 2001: Pretrial Hearing Covers Key Issues In Camm Case
- December 10, 2001: Judge To Consider Camm's Alleged Affairs
- November 21, 2001: Police: 'Irish Travelers' Probe Nearly Finished
- November 9, 2001: Judge Denies Camm Bond Request
- November 6, 2001: Camm Bond Decision Expected This Week
- November 5, 2001: Bond Hearing Scheduled For Camm
- October 29, 2001: Camm Bond Hearing Pushed Back
- October 26, 2001: New Evidence Revealed In Camm Case
Copyright 2008 by WLKY.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.














